Additional user story: As a meeting attendee, I want to pay close attention to all speakers, take a few notes, but be able to later on review a detailed transcription to improve my notes and recollection of the specifics of what was communicated in the meeting.
As a Totally Cool, but probably not really plausible at this time bonus: speaker tagging (kind of like a stage or film script). Clearly actual identification would be way too much to tackle, but making distinctions between different speakers based on differences in voice.
TRANSCRIPT BEGIN
Speaker1: thanks for coming to the meeting everyone. today’s topic is our new web application.
Speaker2: I’m glad you brought that up, i am still stuck on my current project. i won’t be able to help.
Speaker1: ok, thanks for letting us know. anyone else too busy to help?
Speaker3: yeah, me too, i’m out
Speaker1: ok, on to the technicals. We’ll need a dedicated server, Kasi, what server can we use?
Speaker4: webserver32 is available and also webserver48.
Speaker1: ok great, let’s use webserver32.
Speaker5: you want me to install a web server on there?
Speaker4: sure please do that. but don’t do the latest version, its not tested yet. go with version 2.5.2
…
Speaker1: ok, everyone thanks for your time, see you next week, one hour later than normal meeting time.
Speaker1: Hey Mycroft, stop transcription.
END TRANSCRIPT